X

Trump’s “most unethical” cabinet

The following article by Will Drabold was in Mic.com’s Navigating Trump’s America email:
Credit: Gary Cameron/Reuters

President Donald Trump’s financial conflicts of interest are well-documented. His companies have seen multimillion-dollar increases in business since he took office, foreign governments and major corporations curry favor by holding events at Trump properties and Trump International Hotel Washington, D.C., leases space from the federal government.

The Cabinet also faces serious questions about their ethics. The resignation of Brenda Fitzgerald, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director, on Wednesday for investing in tobacco companies while leading America’s anti-smoking efforts reminds us of these issues of transparency and financial motives, government watchdogs told Mic.

“They just don’t care, they just don’t care at all,” Robert Weissman, president of corporate accountability group Public Citizen, said in an interview. “The kind of thing that happens now, routinely, would have been the signature scandal of prior administrations.”
This week alone, multiple Cabinet officials have faced scrutiny for ethics and transparency issues. The Washington Post reported Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson used his son to organize events in Baltimore over the summer — despite warnings from department ethics officials that Ben Carson Jr. was inviting his own business associates to events with his father, a top government official. Meanwhile, Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta allegedlyremoved information from a report that showed a new federal rule on pooling tips could lead to employees losing out on billions of dollars.
But that’s nothing new. In October, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin removed research from his agency’s website that contradicted his views on the Republican tax plan — which may benefit Trump to the tune of $11 million. And the Cabinet — the wealthiest ever — and their families will see a windfall of hundreds of millions of dollars from repeal of the estate tax alone.
Such stories haven’t made major headlines throughout the first year of Trump’s chaotic presidency. This week, for example, focus was placed on the State of the Union address and the ongoing controversy over a Republican-drafted memo about the FBI.
“In any other normal time, these would be big scandals,” Stephen Spaulding, chief of strategy for government watchdog group Common Cause, said in an interview. “There would be hearings. But it feels like any other day in Washington, unfortunately. The danger is that it becomes normalized, and we forget what is a big deal and what isn’t a big deal.”
Reports from government watchdog groups that review Trump’s first year in office largely focus on the president. There is just so much to track with Trump alone, the groups said. But groups like Common Cause and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW, a left-leaning accountability group, did document some alleged abuses by Trump’s closest advisers.
Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross has a “pattern and practice of ignoring, if not flouting, his legal and ethical obligations to disclose his interests and avoid conflicts of interest,” CREW wrote in a report about the administration’s ethics. And in its “Trump’s ethically challenged Cabinet” section, Common Cause wrote of Mnuchin that his “investments have not been disclosed, raising the issue of potential Mnuchin conflicts of interest arising from his undisclosed holdings that the public will never know existed.”
“If Trump won’t divest, why should anyone else?” Jordan Leibowitz, communications director at CREW, said in an interview. “It’s security by obscurity — there are so many potential ethics issues it’s hard to follow any particular one.”
“People are a little bit anesthetized to it,” Weissman added.
Data and Research Manager: