The following article by Cleve R. Wootson, Jr., was posted on the Washington Post website July 9, 2017:
On Sunday morning, President Trump spoke of his new alliance with Russian President Vladimir Putin to erect an “impenetrable Cyber Security unit so that election hacking, & many other negative things, will be guarded.”
This, the president tweeted at 7:31 a.m., came after Putin “vehemently denied” interfering with the 2016 U.S. election.
The tweet’s timing could not have been more perfect — for congressional critics of Trump’s new plan.
It gave them just enough of a head start to workshop one-liners and practice their comedic timing before the Sunday morning political talk shows.
Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) quipped on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that Trump’s plan was “not the dumbest idea I’ve ever heard, but it’s pretty close.”
Graham called Trump “literally the only person I know of who doesn’t believe Russia attacked our election in 2016″ and said he was “dumbfounded.” Graham said Trump is “hurting his presidency by not embracing the fact that Putin is the bad guy.”
A special counsel has been appointed to lead the Justice Department’s probe into the Trump campaign’s possible Russia ties. There’s also a criminal probe and congressional fact-finding investigations, all examining Russia.
Yet on Sunday, of the 193 countries Trump could have partnered with on cybersecurity, he chose Russia.
Putin & I discussed forming an impenetrable Cyber Security unit so that election hacking, & many other negative things, will be guarded..
…and safe. Questions were asked about why the CIA & FBI had to ask the DNC 13 times for their SERVER, and were rejected, still don’t….
I strongly pressed President Putin twice about Russian meddling in our election. He vehemently denied it. I’ve already given my opinion…..
The irony was not lost on members of Congress.
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), speaking on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” deadpanned: “I am sure that Vladimir Putin could be of enormous assistance in that effort since he’s doing the hacking.”
McCain deadpans on Trump’s cybersecurity unit w/ Russia: Putin could be of assistance “since he’s doing the hacking”
McCain said “there has been no penalty whatsoever” for Russia’s interference in the U.S. election — or in other countries.
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who has been a Trump critic since they faced off in the GOP primaries last year, tweeted comparisons to other partnerships that would appear doomed from the start.
While reality & pragmatism requires that we engage Vladimir Putin, he will never be a trusted ally or a reliable constructive partner. 1/3
Partnering with Putin on a “Cyber Security Unit” is akin to partnering with Assad on a “Chemical Weapons Unit”. 2/3
We have no quarrel with Russia or the Russian people. Problem is with Putin & his oppression, war crimes & interference in our elections 1/3
The criticism — and claims of confusion — spanned both sides of the aisle.
Rep. Ruben Kihuen (D-Nev.) retweeted a statement from Nikki Haley, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations: “We can’t trust Russia and we won’t ever trust Russia.”
And other legislators chimed in:
Someone please explain to me how this makes sense. https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/884016887692234753 …
And the quips and criticism weren’t coming from politicians alone. Preet Bharara, the former U.S. attorney in Manhattan whom Trump fired in March, took the president to task for his statements about Putin’s denials.
When pursuing a corrupt politician, mobster or murderer on strong FBI evidence, if he “vehemently denied it,” we just dropped it usually. https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/884012097805406208 …
