The report is based on documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, and it shows how Trump’s organization gave different information to his lender than he did to New York City tax authorities regarding occupancy, expenses, and profits for several of his buildings. For the taxman, Trump allegedly undervalued his assets, so that his taxes would be artificially lower; for lenders, he allegedly inflated the numbers to make things seem more profitable. The discrepancy between the reports constitutes “versions of fraud,” Nancy Wallace, a finance professor at the University of California at Berkeley, told ProPublica. “This kind of stuff is not OK.”The tax documents in question became available via a FOIA request because Trump filed an appeal over his property tax bill for nine years in a row. ProPublica was able to obtain the information from the lender side because Trump’s lender, Ladder Capital, sold the debt on his buildings. Their analysis found that in 2017, Trump claimed twice as much income from one of his buildings to his lender as he did to tax authorities — meaning he may have lied to the IRS while literally serving as the U.S. president that the organization nominally reports to.
View the complete October 17 article by Ezra Marcus on the Mic.com website here.