Trump takes immediate step to try to curb new inspector general’s autonomy, as battle over stimulus oversight begins

Washington Post logoIn signing statement, he signals he could restrict new watchdog’s independence

Immediately after signing the historic $2 trillion coronavirus aid package, President Trump sought to curb oversight provisions in the bill by asserting presidential authority over a new inspector general’s office.

The move could presage a major battle between the White House and Capitol Hill as the Trump administration moves to implement the new law.

In a White House signing statement released Friday evening, Trump questioned the constitutionality of the law’s requirement that a new Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery notify Congress immediately if the administration “unreasonably” withholds information requested by investigators. Continue reading.

Trump Says He Is Considering Pardoning Ex-Adviser Michael Flynn

Trump accused the FBI of losing Flynn’s “records.” Attorney General William Barr recently ordered a review Flynn’s criminal case.

President Donald Trump on Sunday said he is “strongly considering” pardoning his former national security adviser Michael Flynn, suggesting that Flynn was unfairly targeted and prosecuted.

“So now it is reported that, after destroying his life & the life of his wonderful family (and many others also), the FBI, working in conjunction with the Justice Department, has ‘lost’ the records of General Michael Flynn,” Trump tweeted. “How convenient. I am strongly considering a Full Pardon!”

Trump, whose complaint was fired off within minutes of several other unrelated complaints and concerns, didn’t expand on what he meant by Flynn’s missing records. Continue reading.

The McGahn ruling could shred Congress’s ability to oversee the executive branch

Washington Post logoTHE U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled last week that it could not order former White House counsel Donald McGahn to appear before the House Judiciary Committee, though the committee issued a subpoena that Mr. McGahn flouted, on President Trump’s orders. If allowed to stand, the ruling would shred Congress’s ability to oversee the executive branch.

Courts have previously brokered informal compromises between Congress and the president on congressional subpoenas, avoiding definitive rulings that would settle the extent of lawmakers’ power to demand documents and testimony. Many judges still wish to avoid formal involvement. The D.C. Circuit’s two-judge majority warned that if courts refereed subpoena disputes between the executive branch and Congress, they would preclude the dealmaking and “flexible settlements” that typically resolve such problems.

But the era of give-and-take has ended. One party in the equation definitively broke faith: President Trump is now refusing to engage in any negotiations with Congress on providing information or witnesses. By refusing to act, courts are not preserving balance; they are ratifying its destruction, because the balance rested in large measure on the possibility that Congress could resort to the courts. “What would disrupt the present balance of power is not a holding that such lawsuits are permissible but the decision that they are not,” Judge Judith W. Rogers wrote in a dissent. “The judiciary can upset that careful equilibrium when it dismisses a suit that it ought to decide.” Continue reading.

Same Goal, Different Playbook: Why Russia Would Support Trump and Sanders

New York Times logoVladimir Putin is eager both to take the sheen off U.S. democracy and for a counterpart who is less likely to challenge his territorial and nuclear ambitions.

At first glance, it may seem contradictory that the nation’s intelligence agencies were telling Congress that President Vladimir V. Putin is presumably striving to get President Trump re-elected, while also warning Senator Bernie Sanders of evidence that he is the Russian president’s favorite Democrat.

But to the intelligence analysts and outside experts who have spent the past three years dissecting Russian motives in the 2016 election, and who tried to limit the effect of Moscow’s meddling in the 2018 midterms, what is unfolding in 2020 makes perfect sense.

Mr. Trump and Mr. Sanders represent the most divergent ends of their respective parties, and both are backed by supporters known more for their passion than their policy rigor, which makes them ripe for exploitation by Russian trolls, disinformation specialists and hackers for hire seeking to widen divisions in American society. Continue reading.

Trump Takes Up Call for Barr to ‘Clean House’ at Justice Dept.

New York Times logoWith a series of retweets, President Trump kept up attacks on federal law enforcement agencies, despite pleas from the attorney general.

WASHINGTON — Ignoring appeals from his attorney general to stop tweeting about the Justice Department, President Trump renewed his attacks on the agency on Wednesday, demanding “JUSTICE” for himself and all future presidents.

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

There must be JUSTICE. This can never happen to a President, or our Country, again! https://twitter.com/repleezeldin/status/1229982311330066433 

Lee Zeldin

@RepLeeZeldin

There are high expectations that the Justice Dept will very soon deliver transparency & ACCOUNTABILITY regarding DOJ/FBI officials who weaponized the awesome powers at their disposal in order to target the Trump campaign. Frustrated Americans demand justice! ⚖️ It’s LONG overdue!

23.2K people are talking about this

With a series of retweets, Mr. Trump appeared to embrace the suggestion that Attorney General William P. Barr “clean shop” at the department. And the president promoted the idea of naming a special counsel to investigate what Tom Fitton, the head of the conservative nonprofit Judicial Watch, described as a “seditious conspiracy” at the department and the F.B.I.

A day earlier, Mr. Barr was, according to some of his associates, considering a different sort of shop cleaning: If his boss did not stop meddling with Justice Department investigations, he was said to be considering his own future.

Democrats fear rule of law crumbling under Trump

The Hill logoDemocrats are issuing dire warnings that the rule of law is under attack by President Trump after the Department of Justice (DOJ) overruled career prosecutors to seek a lighter sentence for longtime Trump aide Roger Stone.

The move incensed Democratic lawmakers and raised new questions about potential White House interference at the agency.

“Left to his own devices, President Trump would turn America into a banana republic, where the dictator can do whatever he wants and the Justice Department is the president’s law firm — not a defender of the rule of law,” Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday on the Senate floor in response.

Many lawmakers called the shocking development just the latest in a series of assaults on the rule of law during Trump’s presidency. For many, the Stone controversy appeared to be a tipping point for the politicization of the top federal law enforcement agency under Trump and what they fear is an unprecedented expansion of presidential powers. Continue reading.

Trump unleashed: President moves with a free hand post-impeachment

The Hill logoPresident Trump is moving swiftly to clear his administration of perceived foes and fill it with loyalists, a sign he’s trying to consolidate power post-impeachment as he heads into the reelection fight.

Trump appears emboldened by his acquittal in the Republican-controlled Senate, ousting individuals from his White House and administration whom he believes crossed him during impeachment. This includes Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, who the Army secretary said Friday, was not under investigation after Trump hinted he may face further disciplinary action after he was dismissed from his White House post and sent back to the Pentagon early.

While some Republicans hoped the president would be chastened by the impeachment proceedings, the opposite has proven true. Continue reading.

Another case Trump meddled in. Another unorthodox intervention from Barr.

Washington Post logoOn Thursday, Attorney General William P. Barr urged President Trump not to tweet about ongoing criminal matters, saying it makes it “impossible for me to do my job.”

On Friday, we got two separate reminders of just how many cases Trump has weighed in on. And one of them showed just how fruitful his efforts appear to have been.

The Washington Post confirmed that Barr has tasked a outside prosecutors with scrutinizing the case against Michael Flynn as well as other sensitive national security and public corruption cases. Trump has repeatedly decried the Justice Department’s actions regarding Flynn, who is awaiting sentencing. He has even doubted that Flynn lied, despite his pleading guilty to doing so. Continue reading.

Trump is running a circus of fascism — but don’t miss the destruction he’s causing behind closed doors

AlterNet logoOver the past week, President Trump’s Circus Maximus of American fascism reached full bloom.

In ancient Rome, the Circus Maximus was the largest coliseum. It hosted chariot races, gladiatorial combat, hunts of wild animals, sporting events, parades and other grand happenings.

Like the Roman Empire in its decline, the United States is now vomiting up grotesque spectacles.  Continue reading.

‘Not just chilling but frightening’: Inside Vindman’s ouster amid fears of further retaliation by Trump

Washington Post logoHe had been publicly vilified by President Trump, marched out of his national security office across from the White House, so Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman wanted only to get his mind off politics as he settled in to watch a television show with his grade-school-age daughter Friday evening.

Then his wife returned home with some news: Much of the country had just watched as former vice president Joe Biden implored the audience to give a standing ovation in Vindman’s honor at the nationally televised Democratic presidential debate in Manchester, N.H.

“Stand up and clap for Vindman. That’s not who we are! We’re not what Trump is!” Biden thundered in the name of the Army officer whom Trump had hours earlier ousted from the White House National Security Council in retaliation for his testimony in the House Democrats’ impeachment probe. Continue reading.