Want to Know More About: Paul Manafort Plea Deal Collapse?

Jeffery Toobin: President Trump “Is Telling Paul Manafort In Effect, Hang In There, You Don’t Have To Cooperate And You Don’t Have To Worry About Mueller Because You May Be Getting A Pardon Is Wildly, Wildly Inappropriate.” JEFFERY TOOBIN: “This is an incredibly inappropriate thing to say. Whether it’s actually an obstruction of justice or part of an impeachable offense, you know, that requires greater analysis and knowledge of the full facts but the fact that he [President Trump] is telling Paul Manafort in effect, hang in there, you don’t have to cooperate and you don’t have to worry about Mueller because you may be getting a pardon is wildly, wildly inappropriate.” [New Day, CNN, 11/29/18; Video]

Willie Geist: “Just Days After We Learned The Special Counsel Wants To Scrap Paul Manafort’s Plea Deal, President Trump Is Now Publicly Discussing A Possible Pardon For His Former Campaign Chairman.” WILLIE GEIST: “Let’s dive right in. Just days after we learned the special counsel wants to scrap Paul manafort’s plea deal, president trump is now publicly discussing a possible pardon for his former campaign chairman. In an oval office interview, president trump left open the possibility of a pardon telling the paper, it was never discussed, but I wouldn’t take it off the table. Why would I take it off the table?” [Morning Joe, MSNBC, 11/29/18; VIDEO]

Willie Geist: “The President Floating The Idea Of A Pardon When He Was Asked. He Said It’s Not Off The Table. That Has To Be Music To Paul Manafort’s Ears Who Is Now Without His Cooperation Deal.” WILLIE GEIST: “In that interview, the president criticized Robert Mueller’s investigation claiming that manafort, Roger stone, and stone associate Jerome Corsi were all asked to lie. If you tell the truth, you go to jail, trump said. You know this flipping stuff is terrible. But I had three people, manafort, Corsi, I don’t know Corsi, but they refuse to say what he demanded. It’s actually very brave, the president said, of the trio and I’m telling you, this is McCarthyism. We are in the McCarthy era. This is no better than McCarthy, says the president of the united States talking about the special counsel’s investigation. Joyce, let’s pick through that a little bit and start with you on the president floating the idea of a pardon when he was asked. He said it’s not off the table. That has to be music to Paul Manafort’s ears who is now without his cooperation deal.” [Morning Joe, MSNBC, 11/29/18; VIDEO] Continue reading “Want to Know More About: Paul Manafort Plea Deal Collapse?”

Whitaker’s post provides ample tools to disrupt Mueller probe

Matthew Whitaker doesn’t have to fire Robert Mueller to throw a wrench in the special counsel’s investigation.

Much of the focus on President Trump’s appointment of Whitaker to temporarily replace former Attorney General Jeff Sessions has been on the possibility of Whitaker removing Mueller, a move that would undoubtedly spark public outrage and trigger full-scale investigations by Democrats, who are poised to take control of the House in January.

But federal regulations offer Whitaker, now acting attorney general, broad authority with respect to the special counsel that extends beyond the ability to remove Mueller, giving him the ability to curtail the probe in ways that would not necessarily become public knowledge until after the Russia investigation is over.

View the complete November 23 article by Morgan Chalifant on The Hill website here.

Mueller says Manafort violated plea agreement

Special Counsel Robert Mueller said in a new filing Monday that Paul ManafortPresident Trump’s one-time campaign chairman, violated his plea agreement by lying to federal prosecutors.

“After signing the plea agreement, Manafort committed federal crimes by lying to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Special Counsel’s Office on a variety of subject matters, which constitute breaches of the agreement,” Mueller’s team said in a joint status report with Paul Manafort’s defense attorneys filed late Monday.

Mueller’s prosecutors asked the judge to schedule a date for sentencing.

View the complete November 26 article by Lydia Wheeler and Morgan Chalfant on The Hill website here.

Trump submits written answers to Mueller

President Trump has submitted his written answers to certain questions related to the Russia investigation to special counsel Robert Mueller, the president’s legal team announced Tuesday.

Trump’s personal lawyer Jay Sekulow said the answers were submitted on Tuesday and cover “issues regarding the Russia-related topics of the inquiry.”

The submission caps off months of high-stakes wrangling between Mueller’s team and the president’s lawyers about what answers Trump would provide for investigators.

View the complete November 20 article by Jordan Fabian on The Hill website here.

Julian Assange has been charged, prosecutors reveal inadvertently in court filing

Prosecutors inadvertently revealed that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been charged under seal, according to a recently unsealed court filing. (Drea Cornejo /The Washington Post)

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been charged under seal, prosecutors inadvertently revealed in a recently unsealed court filing — a development that could significantly advance the probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election and have major implications for those who publish government secrets.

The disclosure came in a filing in a case unrelated to Assange. Assistant U.S. Attorney Kellen S. Dwyer, urging a judge to keep the matter sealed, wrote that “due to the sophistication of the defendant and the publicity surrounding the case, no other procedure is likely to keep confidential the fact that Assange has been charged.” Later, Dwyer wrote the charges would “need to remain sealed until Assange is arrested.”

Dwyer is also assigned to the WikiLeaks case. People familiar with the matter said what Dwyer was disclosing was true, but unintentional.

View the complete November 15 article by Matt Zapotosky and Devlin Barret on The Washington Post website here.

Trump admits he was thinking about the Russia investigation when he appointed controversial acting AG

Credit: AP Photo, Susan Walsh

When asked his thoughts on the attorney general situation, Trump brought up Robert Mueller’s investigation totally unprompted.

When President Donald Trump fired Attorney General Jeff Sessions a day after the midterm elections and replaced him with former U.S. attorney and DOJ chief of staff Matthew Whitaker, there was an unspoken but obvious reason for his decision. It was telegraphed by Whitaker’s long history of opposing special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Trump’s ties to Russia, calling it a “witch hunt” and warning that any probe into the Trump family finances was a “red line.”

So it was remarkable when Trump, in a Thursday interview with the right-wing Daily Caller, came out and said it directly.

“Could you tell us where your thinking is currently on the attorney general position?” asked Daily Caller reporters Saagar Enjeti and Benny Johnson.

View the complete November 15 article by Matthew Chapman on the AlterNet.org website here.

Lindsey Graham Awkwardly Tries To Walk Back Vow To Unleash ‘Holy Hell’ On Trump HuffPost

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) is attempting to explain his reversal on a 2017 threat that there would be “holy hell to pay” if President Donald Trump fired Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Although Sessions got the boot this week, Graham vowed instead to work with Trump “to find a confirmable, worthy successor.”

When confronted with his previous comments on Thursday, Graham chuckled.

View the complete November 9 article by Ed Mazza on the Huffington Post website on the Yahoo News website here.

Drama builds around Stone in Mueller probe

Robert Mueller continues to zero in on Roger Stone as speculation builds that the special counsel could take a major overt step in his Russia investigation following the midterm elections next week.

Stone, a longtime adviser to President Trump who briefly worked on his campaign, is viewed as central to the question of what, if anything, members of the Trump campaign knew in advance about Democratic emails hacked by Russian operatives and then released by WikiLeaks.

Legal analysts say Mueller is likely interested in determining whether the campaign helped coordinate the document dump, and views Stone as key to making that judgment.

View the complete November 3 article by Morgan Chalfant on The Hill website here.

Former top White House official revises statement to special counsel about Flynn’s calls with Russian ambassador

A former top White House official has revised her statement to investigators about a key event in the probe of Russian interference in the 2016 election, after her initial claim was contradicted by the guilty plea of former national security adviser Michael Flynn, according to people familiar with the matter.

K.T. McFarland, who briefly served as Flynn’s deputy, has now said that he may have been referring to sanctions when they spoke in late December 2016 after Flynn’s calls with Russia’s ambassador to the United States, these people said.

When FBI agents first visited her at her Long Island home in the summer of 2017, McFarland denied ever talking to Flynn about any discussion of sanctions between him and the ambassador, Sergey Kislyak, in December 2016, during the presidential transition.

View the complete September 22 article by Shane Harris and Devlin Barrett on the Washington Post website here.

Michael Cohen has reportedly discussed Trump’s dealings with Russia in interviews with Mueller

Michael Cohen has discussed President Donald Trump’s dealings with Russia in hours of interviews with special counsel Robert Mueller’s team over the past month, ABC News reported Thursday.

According to ABC News, Trump’s former personal attorney and fixer has participated in multiple interviews with Mueller in recent weeks, the conversations in which “focused primarily on all aspects of Trump’s dealings with Russia — including financial and business dealings and the investigation into alleged collusion with Russia by the Trump campaign and its surrogates to influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.”

Investigators also reportedly asked whether Trump or anyone close to him had discussed the possibility of a pardon with Cohen, suggesting Mueller’s team is considering Cohen’s testimony in their probe into possible obstruction of justice on the part of the president.

View the complete September 20 article by Eric Lutz on the Mic.com website here.