Trump administration authorized nuclear energy companies to share technological information with Saudi Arabia

Secretary of Energy Rick Perry behind President Trump at the 2017. Credit: Steve Helber, AP

The Trump administration has kept secret seven authorizations it has issued since November 2017 allowing U.S. nuclear energy companies to share sensitive technological information with Saudi Arabia, even though the kingdom has not yet agreed to anti-proliferation terms required to construct a pair of U.S.-designed civilian nuclear power plants.

The Energy Department and State Department have not only kept the authorizations from the public but also refused to share information about them with congressional committees that have jurisdiction over nuclear proliferation and safety.

The authorizations, issued to at least six companies, cover “Part 810” information, named for a regulatory clause that allows U.S. companies to divulge some design information to compete for contracts with foreign buyers. The regulations for Part 810 technology-sharing provide a list of “generally authorized destinations.” Saudi Arabia is not on the list.

View the complete March 28 article by Steve Mufson on The Washington Post website here.

Here’s why Trump’s new strategy to keep ailing coal and nuclear plants open makes no sense

The following article by James Van Nostrand, Director of the Center for Energy and Sustainable Development; Professor of Law, West Virginia University, was posted on the Conversation.com website June 6, 2018:

Credit Spencer Platt, Getty Images

President Donald Trump recently ordered Energy Secretary Rick Perry to take “immediate steps” to stop the closure of coal and nuclear power plants.

And according to a draft memo that surfaced the same day, the federal government may establish a “Strategic Electric Generation Reserve” to purchase electricity from coal and nuclear plants for two years.

Both proposals, which have garnered little support, are premised on these power plants being essential to national security. If implemented, the government would be activating emergency powers rarely tapped before for any purpose.

Based on my four decades of experience as a utility regulatory attorney and law professor, I can see why this proposal has caused much controversy, partly because of how energy markets work. Continue reading “Here’s why Trump’s new strategy to keep ailing coal and nuclear plants open makes no sense”

Trump administration plan to prop up coal and nuclear markets rejected by regulators

The following article by Evan Halper was posted on the Los Angeles Times website January 8, 2018:

Secretary Rick Perry

Trump administration plan to force utilities to purchase more coal and nuclear power was rejected Monday by federal regulators, undermining the president’s energy agenda and his promise to revive the coal industry.

The five-member Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which is dominated by Trump appointees, unanimously rejected the proposal. Its members were not persuaded by arguments from Energy Secretary Rick Perry that solar, wind and other forms of renewable power were destabilizing the nation’s power grid and needed to be backstopped with more coal and nuclear power at a considerable cost to consumers. Continue reading “Trump administration plan to prop up coal and nuclear markets rejected by regulators”