The Tax Bill That Would Launch More Than 13,000 Yachts

Credit: Xeromatic via Lifeofpix.com

The current congressional majority has made its priorities painfully clear. In 2017, the legislative calendar was dominated by an attempt to strip health care from millions of people in order to provide significant tax cuts to the wealthy. When that failed, Congress turned to a tax bill known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA), which was essentially a corrupt giveaway that provided massive windfalls to wealthy donors, special interests, and members of Congress themselves. The law will provide more than $84.7 billion in tax cuts to the top 1 percent of Americans in 2019, while increasing health insurance premiums for millions of people and resulting in nearly 9 million fewer people with coverage.

Many of the staffers who were most involved in the TCJA’s passage have left the Hillfor lucrative jobs as lobbyists for the special interests to whom they provided special tax breaks. Rep. Pat Tiberi (R-OH), who helped draft the TCJA, left shortly after its passage to become the head of the Ohio Business Roundtable—many of whose members benefited substantially from the bill.

Perhaps the most ostentatious example of this corruption came from Florida Rep. Vern Buchanan (R). Rep. Buchanan sits on the House committee that was charged with drafting the TCJA—a bill that gave him millions of dollars in special tax breaks. On the same day that he voted to pass the bill, Rep. Buchanan purchased a brand new 73-foot yacht with a base price of nearly $3 million.

View more of the article by Sam Berger and Galen Hendrickson on the Center for American Progress website.

Brett Kavanaugh Exposed As Ken Starr’s Designated Leaker

Attorney Kenneth Starr speaks during arguments before the California Supreme Court to overturn California’s Proposition 8 in San Francisco, California March 5, 2009. REUTERS/Paul Sakuma

During the lengthy investigation that led to President Bill Clinton’s impeachment in 1998, the Office of the Independent Counsel (OIC), led by Kenneth Starr, leaked non-public information — including grand jury information whose release was allegedly illegal—to a stable of selected journalists, some of whom were identified by the OIC as “confidential informants.”

One of the OIC officials tasked to provide this non-public information — designed, in part, to smear Bill and Hillary Clinton — was Brett Kavanaugh, an accomplished Republican political operative whom Donald Trump has nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court.

During the spring of 1997, I received an offer of a $100,000 advance from a conservative publisher, Regnery Publishing, to research and write a book about the controversial death of Vincent Foster, President Clinton’s deputy White House counsel. Regnery, which wanted a real crime reporter with good contacts in the law-enforcement community, gave me an end-of-the-year deadline.

View the complete article by Dan E. Moldea posted (9/11/18) on the National Memo website.

New Documents: Kavanaugh Lied Under Oath, Refuses To Say If It’s An Impeachable Offense

Newly released emails, which Republicans tried to keep secret, revealed that Kavanaugh potentially lied under oath. In his written Q&A, he refused to answer whether lying under oath is an impeachable offense for a judge. We now know Kavanaugh has misled the Senate and the American people multiple times. What else are Republicans hiding?

Newly released emails show that Kavanaugh misled the Senate, while under oath, about his involvement in a controversial court nomination.

Politico: “In 2006, Brett Kavanaugh told a Senate committee that he wasn’t ‘primarily’ involved in shepherding the nomination of controversial circuit court nominee Charles Pickering when Kavanaugh worked in the George W. Bush White House. But emails released Wednesday show that Kavanaugh conducted meetings with Republican senators and was closely engaged in Pickering’s nomination.” Continue reading “New Documents: Kavanaugh Lied Under Oath, Refuses To Say If It’s An Impeachable Offense”

Trump Tax Law 2.0: Republicans Double Down On Tax Cuts For The Rich

The Trump tax law sent the deficit skyrocketing and gave a majority of the benefits to the richest Americans, while doing nothing for working families. Now, Republicans are doubling down on that unpopular law with more tax cuts for the wealthy.

The nonpartisan CBO says the deficit has skyrocketed by more than $200 billion over the last year, in large part because of Trump’s corporate tax cuts.

Axios: “The U.S. deficit grew by $222 billion from this time last year — reaching a total of $895 billion, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office… This increase was due mostly to the new Republican tax law and Congress’ routine decision to increase spending, which grew by 7% compared to revenue growth of only 1%. The CBO says the deficit will approach $1 trillion by the end of Fiscal Year 2019.”

Washington Post: “Corporate tax receipts fell 30 percent in the past 11 months, the CBO said, precipitated by the large reduction in rates from the massive tax overhaul passed by Congress last year.” Continue reading “Trump Tax Law 2.0: Republicans Double Down On Tax Cuts For The Rich”

Kavanaugh hearing: John Dean warns of a Supreme Court overly deferential to presidential power

The following article by Seung Min Kim was posted on the Washington Post website September 7, 2018:

John Dean, the former Nixon White House counsel who played a crucial role in the Watergate scandal, testified Friday that confirming Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh as a justice will lead to the “most presidential-powers friendly” Supreme Court in the modern age.

The sharp criticism was laid out in Dean’s remarks before the Senate Judiciary Committee on the last day of Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings. More than two dozen witnesses testified in favor of and against President Trump’s Supreme Court pick.

Dean argued in his testimony that conservatives have “slowly done a 180-degree turn” on executive power and that a Supreme Court that is overly deferential to the president is “deeply troubling,” with Republicans controlling both the House and Senate.

View the complete article here.

Anti-Trump Fervor Puts Senate in Play

The following article by Shawn Zeller was posted on the Roll Call website September 7, 2018:

Democrats “definitely have a chance to win the Senate,” election analyst Nathan Gonzales tells CQ on Congress. He maps out where Democrats can pick up Senate seats in the midterm elections as well as which races they are most likely to lose.

View the article here.

The apathy in the media regarding Brett Kavanaugh is a national scandal

The following article by Julie Millican was posted on the MediaMatters.org website September 6, 2018:

Credit: Melissa Joskow, Media Matters

Picture this: A controversial, deeply unpopular president mired in scandal makes a Supreme Court nomination that his party is desperately trying to jam through the process before virtually anything is known about the nominee. Then, in the middle of it, an anonymous senior official in the president’s administration pens an op-ed in The New York Times that lays out serious questions about the president’s fitness for office and the dangers he poses to the country. You’d think that conversation in the media would focus on the fact that this president — who is so unstable that his own senior staff members are sounding the alarm — is about to make a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court.

You’d be wrong.

Let’s start at the beginning. In late June, Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement, and President Donald Trump moved quickly to nominate Brett Kavanaugh — a former George W. Bush administration official who currently sits on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit — to replace him. Kavanaugh’s path to confirmation has carried all the hallmarks of the Trump administration: conflicts of interest, unprecedented secrecy, violations of norms, whiffs of corruption, and lies.

View the complete article here.

Kavanaugh advised against calling Roe v. Wade ‘settled law’ while a White House lawyer

The following article by Robert Barnes and Michael Kranish was posted on the Washington Post website September 6, 2018:

During his confirmation hearing for the D.C. Circuit in 2006, Brett Kavanaugh said, “I would follow Roe v. Wade faithfully and fully.” (C-SPAN)

Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh as a White House lawyer in the Bush administration advised against referring to the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade as the “settled law of the land,” according to a 2003 email.

“I am not sure that all legal scholars refer to Roe as the settled law of the land at the Supreme Court level since Court can always overrule its precedent, and three current Justices on the Court would do so,” Kavanaugh wrote after reviewing a draft of what was intended to be an op-ed in favor of a judicial nominee.

The email was first given to the New York Times and has since been made public by the Senate Judiciary Committee. It was among emails deemed “committee confidential” and not made public, although it was unclear what it was about the memo that prevented its earlier release.

View the complete article here.

Kavanaugh squirms as senator reveals big-money backers of his nomination

The following article by Erick Bohlert was posted on the ShareBlue.com website September 5, 2018:

The right-wing Federalist Society hand-picked Kavanaugh to be Trump’s Supreme Court nominee. Kavanaugh pretended not to know anything about that.

Brett Kavanaugh, Pres. Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Credit: J. Scott Applewhite, AP Photo

Trump’s extremist Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh, tried to play dumb at his Wednesday confirmation hearing about the secretive network of wealthy conservative donors who hand-picked him to be on Trump’s Supreme Court shortlist.

It’s been widely reported that Trump promised to choose his Supreme Court nominees from a list approved by the Federalist Society, a right-wing legal activist group with a huge influence on the GOP.

But rather than acknowledge this, Kavanaugh told a disbelieving Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) that Trump was really the one in charge of the nomination process.

View the complete article here.

Want to Know More About: Brett Kavanaugh Hearing

Lester Holt: “Day Three Of The Confirmation Hearing For Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh Erupted Into A Battle Like We’ve Never Seen Before. The Public Getting A Look At Previously Secret Emails From Kavanaugh On Hot Including Abortion And Democrats Want To Get More Released And On The Record.” [Nightly News, NBC, 9/6/18; VIDEO]

Pete Williams: “Among The Documents, This One From 2003 About A Draft White House Of Ed Involving Abortion, The Article Said It’s Widely Accepted By Legal Scholars That Roe V Wade Is Settled Law And The Supreme Court Could Overrule It. Kavanaugh Said He Was Making A Narrow Point.” [Nightly News, NBC, 9/6/18; VIDEO]

Pete Williams: “He Also Denied Today He Ever Talked To Anyone At The Law Firm Of A Former Lawyer For President Trump About The Mueller Investigation After Being Pressed Last Night By Senator Kamala Harris.” [Nightly News, NBC, 9/6/18; VIDEO] Continue reading “Want to Know More About: Brett Kavanaugh Hearing”