Trump’s appointees are promoting anti-choice “alternative science” ripped from right-wing media

The following article by Julie Tulbert was posted on the Media Matters website June 20, 2017:

LA Times describes appointees as “the four horsewomen of disinformation” on abortion and contraception

A new article in the New England Journal of Medicine called out four of President Donald Trump’s recent appointees for promoting bad policy on contraception and abortion — policies that are rooted in “alternative science” supported by discredited research and right-wing media.

A new article in the New England Journal of Medicine called out four of President Donald Trump’s recent appointees for promoting bad policy on contraception and abortion — policies that are rooted in “alternative science” supported by discredited research and right-wing media.

In a June 14 article in the New England Journal of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Law School professor R. Alta Charo, who focuses on the law and bioethics, wrote about President Donald Trump’s appointment of Charmaine Yoest, Teresa Manning, and Valerie Huber to the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), as well as his assignment of Katy Talento to serve as a health care adviser on his Domestic Policy Council. Charo lamented that these appointments exemplified how “reproduction has become the victim of alternative science, rife with alternative definitions of well-understood medical conditions.”

In a June 15 article for the Los Angeles Times, Michael Hiltzik characterized Charo’s article as “identifying four Trump appointees as carriers of the disinformation virus” and called the appointees “the four horsewomen of disinformation.” Most alarmingly, Charo told Hiltzik that these four appointees “could influence an entire generation’s attitude toward contraception, for the worse.” Continue reading “Trump’s appointees are promoting anti-choice “alternative science” ripped from right-wing media”

In an age of ‘alternative facts,’ a massacre of schoolchildren is called a hoax

The following article by Barbara Demick was posted on the L.A. Times website February 3, 2017:

Noah Pozner, the youngest child killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012. Some people contend he wasn’t killed, or claim he never existed, and are tormenting his parents. (Courtesy of Pozner family)

If there is anything worse than losing a child, it is losing a child and having people taunt you over the loss.

That is what happened to the family of Noah Pozner, a 6-year-old with tousled brown hair and lollipop-red lips, the youngest of the 26 children and staff members gunned down in 2012 at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.

The massacre that shook the country and opened new anxiety over gun violence, the family has received hate-filled calls and violent emails from people who say they know the shooting was a hoax. Photos of their son — some with pornographic and anti-Semitic content — have been distributed on websites. Continue reading “In an age of ‘alternative facts,’ a massacre of schoolchildren is called a hoax”

What Trump got wrong on Twitter this week (#4)

The following article by Michelle Ye Hee Lee was posted on the Washington Post website February 3, 2017:

Welcome to the fourth installment of Fact Checker’s series highlighting what President Trump got wrong on Twitter in a given week. Last week, we fact-checked Trump’s tweets as a part of a larger round-up of inaccurate and exaggerated statements from his first week in office.

Here’s a look at what Trump got wrong in 10 tweets this week. Continue reading “What Trump got wrong on Twitter this week (#4)”