— Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), in a Fox Business Network interview, Nov. 5, 2019
“The Sixth Amendment guarantees an individual the right to face their accuser. Yet the House of Representatives has been conducting a secret impeachment inquiry based on secret claims made by a secret whistleblower. My bill would make clear that the Sixth Amendment is not superseded by statutes and that the president should be afforded the same rights that we all should: to understand the nature of the allegations brought against them and to face their accuser. This is in the Sixth Amendment. So for all the caterwauling about whistleblower statutes, there is a high law of the land. It is the Constitution, it is the Bill of Rights, and the Sixth Amendment says if you’re accused of a crime, you get to face your accuser.”
— Paul, in a Senate floor speech, Nov. 6, 2019
Paul has long championed protections for whistleblowers. But the one who filed a complaint about President Trump should be unmasked and confronted, Paul says.
The Sixth Amendment gives criminal defendants the right to face their accusers. A defense attorney, for example, might cross-examine a witness to poke holes in their testimony.
But Paul’s claim falls apart quickly, because the Sixth Amendment applies only in criminal cases. Trump is facing impeachment — a different process with its own constitutional rules. Confrontation rights aren’t guaranteed in impeachment cases, though the Senate holds a trial in which the accused may defend themselves from any charges.
View the complete November 8 article by Salvador Rizzo on The Washington Post website here.