Kevin McCarthy met with officer injured in Trump’s insurrection — and it didn’t end well

Raw Story Logo

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) finally met with a police officer who is still out on medical leave after being brutally attacked during Donald Trump’s January 6th insurrection.

“I asked him specifically for a commitment to denounce that publicly. And he said that he would address it at a personal level, with some of those members. But again, I think that as a leader of the House Republican, or I’m sorry, as the leader of the House Republican Party, it’s important to hear those denouncements publicly,” DC Metropolitan Police Officer Michael Fanone said.

When asked how the meeting went after leaving McCarthy’s office, Fanone replied, “I need a drink.” Continue reading.

Emails Show Top Trump Aides Knew Violence Loomed On Jan. 6

National Memo logo

On December 19, President Donald Trump blasted out a tweet to his 88 million followers, inviting supporters to Washington for a “wild” protest.

Earlier that week, one of his senior advisers had released a 36-page report alleging significant evidence of election fraud that could reverse Joe Biden’s victory. “A great report,” Trump wrote. “Statistically impossible to have lost the 2020 Election. Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!”

The tweet worked like a starter’s pistol, with two pro-Trump factions competing to take control of the “big protest.” Continue reading.

White House official throws GOP senators’ words back in their faces after Republicans fake outrage

Raw Story Logo

The White House has agreed to a sweeping, bipartisan compromise on infrastructure with at least 11 Republican senators saying they are in favor of the deal — but already, many Republicans are complaining because of President Joe Biden’s comment that he would only sign the bill if paired with a reconciliation bill that can be passed with Democratic votes alone.

The problem for Republicans, however, is that passing a reconciliation bill alongside the bipartisan bill was always on the table — and in fact some Republicans even suggested they were fine with Biden pursuing such a strategy.

Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), who unsuccessfully headed up the first round of infrastructure talks, said that “we know that they have that option, we used that option in 2017,” and Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO) said “My advice to the White House has been, take that bipartisan win … and then if you want to force the rest of the package on Republicans in the Congress and the country, you can certainly do that.” Continue reading.

After controversy, U.S. Catholic bishops say there will be ‘no national policy on withholding Communion from politicians’

Washington Post logo

Days after a vote that triggered a tsunami of Catholic debate about Communion and politics, leading U.S. Catholic bishops working on an upcoming document about the sacrament are now de-emphasizing direct confrontation with President Biden or other Catholic politicians who support abortion rights.

Seventy-five percent of members of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops voted during their annual spring meeting on June 17 to go ahead with the drafting of a position paper on the “meaning of the Eucharist,” the core ritual of the Catholic faith, believed to be the presence of Jesus. Before the vote, live on Zoom, dozens of bishops debated the fact that the proposal for the document was a response to the election of Biden, a weekly Mass-attending Catholic who supports abortion rights.

Catholic teaching opposes abortion. Continue reading.

Trump Aides Prepared Insurrection Act Order During Debate Over Protests

New York Times logo

President Donald Trump never invoked the act, but fresh details underscore the intensity of his interest last June in using active-duty military to curb unrest.

Responding to interest from President Donald J. Trump, White House aides drafted a proclamation last year to invoke the Insurrection Act in case Mr. Trump moved to take the extraordinary step of deploying active-duty troops in Washington to quell the protests that followed the killing of George Floyd, two senior Trump administration officials said.

The aides drafted the proclamation on June 1, 2020, during a heated debate inside the administration over how to respond to the protests. Mr. Trump, enraged by the demonstrations, had told the attorney general, William P. Barr, the defense secretary, Mark T. Esper, and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of staff, Gen. Mark A. Milley, that he wanted thousands of active-duty troops on the streets of the nation’s capital, one of the officials said.

Mr. Trump was talked out of the plan by the three officials. But a separate group of White House staff members wanted to leave open the option for Mr. Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act to call in the military. Continue reading.

3 House Republicans fined for not wearing mask on floor

Roll Call Logo

Violations came before mandate was lifted for vaccinated people

Three House Republicans each must pay $500 fines imposed by the sergeant-at-arms for being warned and then failing to wear a mask on the House floor.

Reps. Brian Mast of Florida, Beth Van Duyne of Texas and Mariannette Miller-Meeks of Iowa were all fined, according to an announcement released on Friday by the House Ethics Committee. 

The three were among 10 Republicans who defied House rules in May requiring the wearing of masks on the floor at the time. Warnings were issued, with the rules providing for fines in the event of a second offense. Continue reading.

Trump Organization Could Face Criminal Charges in D.A. Inquiry

New York Times logo

An indictment of the Trump Organization could mark the first criminal charges to emerge from an investigation by the Manhattan district attorney into Donald J. Trump and his business dealings.

The Manhattan district attorney’s office has informed Donald J. Trump’s lawyers that it is considering criminal charges against his family business, the Trump Organization, in connection with fringe benefits the company awarded a top executive, according to several people with knowledge of the matter.

The prosecutors had been building a case for months against the executive, Allen H. Weisselberg, as part of an effort to pressure him to cooperate with a broader inquiry into Mr. Trump’s business dealings. But it was not previously known that the Trump Organization also might face charges.

If the case moves ahead, the district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., could announce charges as soon as next week, the people said. Mr. Vance’s prosecutors have been conducting the investigation along with lawyers from the office of the New York State attorney general, Letitia James. Continue reading.

More Americans ‘socially liberal’ than conservative for first time – huge swing over past 20 years

AlterNet Logo

For the first time more Americans identify as “socially liberal” than conservative, revealing a huge double-digit swing over the past two decades.

Gallup reveals 34% of Americans now say they are socially liberal, 30% conservative, and 35% identify as moderate.

But as the pollster notes, starting in 2001 “social conservatives had a clear advantage over social liberals — by 12 points, on average.” That started to change in 2013, and now socially liberal has pulled ahead, representing a huge 16 point swing from 2001 to 2021. Continue reading.

Minnesota House, Senate approve significant investments in early childhood

House DFL logo

SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA – On Saturday, the Minnesota House of Representatives and Minnesota Senate approved a compromise Health and Human Services (HHS) budget pursuant to a bipartisan agreement. The budget, which now awaits an expected signature from Governor Walz, includes investments, funded through President Biden’s American Rescue Plan, targeted at the youngest Minnesotans and those who support them. 

“Investments in the earliest years have the biggest payoff for both individuals and society,” said Rep. Dave Pinto (DFL – St. Paul), chair of the House Early Childhood Finance and Policy Committee. “While there is much more to do in this area, these investments will stabilize and reform this critical sector, so that parents can work, employers can expand, and children and communities can thrive, now and long into the future.”  

Early care and learning was in crisis even before the pandemic – unaffordable and inaccessible for families and paying poverty wages to providers, Even as many families struggle to afford this critical service, providers operate on thin margins and child care professionals receive poverty-level wages, hampering their ability to provide high-quality care. 

The approved HHS budget uses the federal funding to address these challenges in multiple ways. To stabilize providers, it invests approximately $300 million in monthly grants over two years, 70 percent of which must be used to increase compensation for workers. An additional investment of more than $30 million will expand the supply of child care, through facility improvements and equipment, training, workforce development, and a new grant program for child care for children with disabilities. 

To help low-income families and those who care for their children, the budget raises reimbursement rates for the Child Care Assistance Program (CCAP) to the 40th percentile of market rates for infants and toddlers, and the 30th percentile for older children. This represents a significant increase from current rates, at the 25th percentile, though is still far below the federal standard of the 75th percentile.  

To support professionals who remain in the field and expand their skills, the budget invests in Teacher Education and Compensation Helps (TEACH) and Retaining Early Educators Through Attaining Incentives Now (REETAIN) grants. TEACH grants will help child care workers earn college credits and degrees with scholarships of up to $10,000 per year and incentives for those who remain in the industry. The REETAIN program offers competitive grants for well-trained child care workers. These investments will provide more stability for workers and the children and families they serve. 

Several provisions aim to improve maternal and infant health and close persistent racial disparities in these critical areas. Investments in Integrated Care for High-Risk Pregnant Women (ICHRP), for example, will expand services for Black women in the metropolitan area and create additional regional care collaboratives for Indigenous women, and the Supporting Healthy Babies grant program provides community-driven education on supporting healthy development during pregnancy and postpartum. The Dignity in Pregnancy and Childbirth Act requires hospitals to offer a course on anti-racism and implicit bias to employees and contractors who regularly work with patients who are pregnant or postpartum. The budget also expands home visiting programs and extends health coverage for low-income women following birth from the current standard of 60 days to a full 12 months.  

Finally, the HHS budget points the way toward significant reforms of early care and learning. It creates a Great Start for All Minnesota Children Task Force, which is directed to develop a ten-year plan for affordable, high-quality early care and learning for all families, with livable wages for teachers. The budget also requires that the Governor’s Children’s Cabinet study early childhood governance and the possible consolidation of programs, which are currently spread over four state agencies. It funds the modernization of regulations, many of which date to the 1980s. It focuses particular support on family child care providers, including establishing a regulatory ombudsperson and one-stop regional assistance network, among many other reforms. 

Health and Human Services is not the only budget area addressing early care and learning. While the E-12 Education budget does not expand investments in this area, it does preserve 4,000 voluntary pre-kindergarten slots that were set to expire. In addition, the Workforce Development budget contains more than $10 million in funding to support child care supply, including major renovations ineligible for the federal funds contained in the HHS budget.  

Supreme Court reshapes Congress’ power to allow lawsuits

Roll Call Logo

In dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas writes that the court ‘has relieved the legislature of its power to create and define rights’

A Supreme Court decision Friday about a class-action lawsuit against credit reporting agency TransUnion limits Congress’s power to determine who can file a federal lawsuit — by shifting more of that decision to the judicial branch.

The case centers on the Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1970, which created a way for consumers to file a lawsuit to recover damages for certain violations of law, in part to protect consumer privacy. The majority ruled, in a sharply divided 5-4 opinion, that some of the plaintiffs did not have the right to file the lawsuit.

In doing so, the majority delves into separation-of-powers issues between the three branches of government. And the court concludes that Congress can give people the right to file a lawsuit over violations of law, but ultimately the federal courts have the power to say whether those people can file those lawsuits. Continue reading.